Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962325›Full record

ReviewBMB reports2026

Deep learning application for genomic data analysis.

Chang Beom Jeong, Hyein Cho, Daechan Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMB reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chang Beom JeongDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea.
Hyein ChoDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea.
Daechan ParkDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon 16499; College of Advanced Bio-Convergence Engineering , Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern genomic sequencing techniques have advanced rapidly, thereby improving data production rates and dimensionality. With this accelerated growth, machine learning, especially deep learning, has been leveraged to analyze complex data and complement conventional bioinformatics methods. Deep learning approaches have been successfully applied in genomics, leading to the development of state-of-the-art models and significantly improved interpretation of genomic data. Here, we review deep learning models in four genomic domains: variant calling, gene expression regulation, motif finding, and 3D chromatin interactions. We summarize the key aspects of model development, such as training and generalization, that enable the efficient application of deep learning models in genomic research. Real-world applications have demonstrated the reliability and efficiency of these models for predicting genomic profiles. Finally, we highlight the future directions of deep learning approaches in genomics by discussing the challenges related to genome tokenization and multi-omics data integration. [BMB Reports 2026; 59(1): 60-68].

Indexed as

Data AnalysisDeep LearningGenomicsComputational BiologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40962325
PMCPMC12867181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.