Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962322›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Stakeholder Perspectives on mHealth Technologies to Prevent Sitting-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Long-Term Care Facilities: Mixed Methods Study.

Tamara Vos-Draper, Erin Vinoski Thomas, Emily Graybill, Melissa Morrow, Kathleen A Jordan, Pamela R Manley, Sharon E Sonenblum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tamara Vos-DraperProgram of Occupational Therapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9038-2764
Erin Vinoski ThomasCenter for Leadership in Disability, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7154-8562
Emily GraybillCenter for Leadership in Disability, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-156X
Melissa MorrowSchool of Health Professions, Center for Health Promotion, Performance, and Rehabilitation Research, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6500-6572
Kathleen A JordanNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5174-8532
Pamela R ManleySchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2016-8188
Sharon E SonenblumNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9747-5683

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
Development of Technologies to Increase In-Seat Movement to Prevent Sitting-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Wheelchair UsersR01AG056255 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HALLBECK, M. SUSAN, MORROW, MELISSA M. · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults with Alzheimer disease (AD) or Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) who require a wheelchair to accommodate disease-associated decline in mobility are at elevated risk for pressure injuries. More than half of residents in long-term care (LTC) facilities in the United States experience AD or ADRD. In LTC facilities, bed-based technologies exist to facilitate pressure injury prevention efforts, but similar technologies have not yet been widely evaluated to address sitting-related pressure injuries.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine preliminary design inputs from care providers for technology to address sitting-related pressure injury prevention in LTC settings. Specifically, we sought to (1) understand the types and use of sitting-related equipment used in LTC for residents with AD or ADRD, (2) identify challenges faced by nurses and other caregivers when repositioning seated residents, and (3) understand care provider preferences for features of future sitting-related feedback technologies designed to facilitate effective and timely repositioning.

methodsSurveys (n=30) and semistructured interviews (n=9) of administrative and direct care providers in LTC facilities were administered. Survey results were summarized, and we used thematic qualitative analysis of interview responses to develop themes around challenges experienced by care providers and their perceptions about how technologies could facilitate the prevention of sitting-related pressure injuries.

resultsSurvey respondents endorsed using many sitting surfaces for LTC residents with memory loss, such as padded reclining chairs, bedside or dining chairs, and wheelchairs with cushions. All indicated that shared equipment is provided by the facility, and 43% of respondents reported having access to a seating specialist at their facility. Sitting time was typically up to 12 hours per day. Themes related to pressure injury prevention in the LTC context, specific to those with memory loss, included (1) barriers to repositioning seated residents vary with the degree of memory loss, (2) care providers are aware of guidelines and policies around the 2-hour repositioning schedule, and (3) care providers are interested in technologies that have relative value over added burden. Care providers expressed interest in mobile health (mHealth) technologies that provide automatic repositioning in later stages of memory loss, delivery of cues for residents with mild memory loss to encourage independent repositioning, and tools to monitor resident sitting and pressure-related outcomes.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the complexity of addressing the repositioning needs of seated LTC residents with AD or ADRD using mHealth technologies due to changes as the disease progresses. mHealth technologies should encourage more independence by residents experiencing milder memory loss, with increasing automaticity in repositioning residents in later stages. Both approaches could potentially minimize care provider burden in repositioning seated residents throughout the day. Design, development, and implementation of technologies should carefully weigh benefit versus burden to care providers and residents and continue to engage with them for feedback as development progresses.

Indexed as

Long-Term CarePressure UlcerSitting PositionStakeholder ParticipationTelemedicineAgedAlzheimer DiseaseDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing HomesQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAlzheimer diseaseassistive technologydementiafeedbacklong-term caremonitoringpressure injuriespreventionuser-centered designwheelchair use

Identifiers

PMID40962322
PMCPMC12489400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.