Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962247›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025

Evaluating partner-involved financial incentive treatments for smoking cessation in dual-smoker couples: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Michelle R vanDellen, Emma Bales, Brittnee M Hampton, Eshita Jain, Ye Shen, Jayani Jayawardhana, Steven R H Beach, Ashley H Chinchilla, James M MacKillop

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle R vanDellenTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Tulsa, OK, United States; Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States. Electronic address: michelle-vandellen@ouhsc.edu.
Emma BalesTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Tulsa, OK, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Brittnee M HamptonDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Eshita JainTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Tulsa, OK, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Ye ShenDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Jayani JayawardhanaDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, United States; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, United States.
Steven R H BeachDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Ashley H ChinchillaCollege of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, United States.
James M MacKillopDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

Randomized Controlled Trial of Dyadic Financial Incentive Treatment for Dual Smoker Couples: Evaluation of Efficacy, Mechanisms, and Cost EffectivenessR01CA276594 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Michelle Renee vanDellen · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA276594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals who smoke combustible nicotine cigarettes and are partnered with another smoker are less likely to quit smoking than other smokers. Financial incentives for cessation increase individual abstinence. However, these interventions have not been examined using a dyadic approach that targets the couple rather than an individual. The current study will evaluate two variants of a dyadic financial incentive intervention for smoking cessation in dual-smoking couples.

methodsFeasibility and tolerability of dyadic financial incentive treatments in dual-smoking couples has been established, along with their preliminary efficacy. The current study will utilize a large-scale clinical trial to systematically evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of change of two variants of dyadic financial incentive interventions among 450 dual-smoking couples.

resultsThe primary study outcome will be 6-month point-prevalence abstinence (self-report abstinence for 7 days + biochemical verification) among targets in dual-smoking couples. Partner abstinence at 6-months, and both target and partner abstinence at 1, 3, and 12 months will be examined as secondary outcomes. Potential treatment mechanisms, including motivational and relationship processes will be evaluated to inform future interventions. DISCUSSION: Individuals with smoking partners experience low motivation to quit and low success rates when they make quit attempts. Current evidence-based interventions target individuals in isolation from their social networks that strongly influence them. This approach represents a critical next step toward developing interventions that effectively capitalize on social network members to produce and sustain smoking cessation.

Indexed as

MotivationSmoking CessationAdultFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmokersBehavioral economicsClinical trialDual-smoking couplesFinancial incentivesSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID40962247
PMCPMC12497355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.