ReviewJournal of molecular biology2026
Allostery in Biomolecular Condensates.
Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Condensates and cell states: A new paradigm for understanding tumor biology.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Spatial biology of crowded tumor cells: A new map for designing drug combinations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Allosteric drugs in biomolecular condensates: ways forward.Drug discovery today · 2026Review
- Leveraging conformational ensembles in allosteric drug discovery.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allosteric proteins and membrane-less biomolecular condensates are physics-governed pivotal functional components. Allosteric regulation is an inherent physical property of dynamic proteins, and dynamic proteins are allosteric. Thus, in biomolecular condensates (like everywhere else in the cell), allostery is at play, and often missing in condensate descriptions is that the cooperative transitions can involve allosteric effects. The condensate environment can be especially conducive to allostery. Condensed settings can increase the chance of protein interaction and allosteric encounters in function-specific condensates. Specific protein-protein interactions provide the structural framework for signals to transmit cooperatively and dynamically, ultimately modulating cell activity. Their interfaces are commonly enriched in nonpolar (hydrophobic) surface. With abundant functionally specific proteins, and surfaces accommodating multiple hydrophobic patches, interconnected multivalent molecular networks are expected. Lacking hydrophobic cores, disordered proteins' folding-upon-binding scenarios often form strong hydrophobic interfaces, and cooperative (partially disordered) multimers are also common. Repelling water is a major force in condensate formation, albeit not the sole. Here we emphasize dilution as functional and allosteric determinant. Extremely high dilution in rapidly growing proliferating cells can stimulate senescence; lower dilution increases concentration, thus, higher probability of increased proximity and reduced separation, driving protein-protein interactions, and allostery. Is there then effective allostery in condensates? We believe that it depends on the cell state. Under normal physiological conditions, with condensates water content around 40% of total cell mass-yes; over 70% could be too diluted. If too low-it can become function-poor aggregate-like. Effective allostery and signaling require specific interactions, extending from clustered receptors to the cytoskeleton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.