ArticleLeukemia research2025
Efficacy and safety of blinatumomab for CD19 + acute leukemias in patients historically excluded from clinical trials due to comorbidities.
Article in Leukemia research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlinatumomab has proven efficacy in the frontline, consolidation, and relapsed/refractory settings in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Its efficacy and safety among patients commonly excluded from clinical trials are unknown. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis single center, retrospective cohort study included patients treated for acute leukemia with blinatumomab with the following pre-existing conditions: liver dysfunction, renal impairment, central nervous system (CNS) conditions, autoimmune disease, solid organ transplantation, or uncontrolled infection. Rates of blinatumomab completion, efficacy outcomes, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity (ICANS), and adverse events specific to the impaired organ leading to inclusion were assessed.
resultsThirty-four patients were included, and 88 % completed at least one cycle of blinatumomab. One patient stopped prematurely due to toxicity and three due to lack of response in the relapsed/refractory setting. Response rates and survival were similar by treatment setting to those treated in clinical trials. The 60-day cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 CRS and ICANS were 23.5 % and 20.8 %, respectively. No excess liver injury, ICANS, autoimmune flares, organ rejection, or infections were observed in cohorts defined by impairment of each system.
conclusionBlinatumomab was successfully administered to the vast majority of patients with a baseline condition that would have led to clinical trial exclusion. Adverse events generally occurred at rates similar to prior clinical trials. These data provide the basis to consider removing certain exclusion criteria from future studies involving blinatumomab, allowing more patients to benefit from its efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.