Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961493›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Framework for Predicting Emergency Department Overcrowding: Development and Evaluation Study.

Orhun Vural, Bunyamin Ozaydin, Khalid Y Aram, James Booth, Brittany Freeman Lindsey, Abdulaziz Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Orhun VuralDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-7918-5307
Bunyamin OzaydinDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6775-0450
Khalid Y AramSchool of Business & Technology, Emporia State University, Emporia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9406-8326
James BoothDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4290-6014
Brittany Freeman LindseyDepartment of Patient Throughput, University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-4234-664X
Abdulaziz AhmedDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6081-8507

Funding

AHRQ HHS R21 HS029410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) overcrowding remains a critical challenge, leading to delays in patient care and increased operational strain. Current hospital management strategies often rely on reactive decision-making, addressing congestion only after it occurs. However, effective patient flow management requires early identification of overcrowding risks to allow timely interventions. Machine learning (ML)-based predictive modeling offers a solution by forecasting key patient flow measures, such as waiting count, enabling proactive resource allocation and improved hospital efficiency.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to develop ML models that predict ED waiting room occupancy (waiting count) at 2 temporal resolutions. The first approach is the hourly prediction model, which estimates the waiting count exactly 6 hours ahead at each prediction time (eg, a 1 PM prediction forecasts 7 PM). The second approach is the daily prediction model, which forecasts the average waiting count for the next 24-hour period (eg, a 5 PM prediction estimates the following day's average). These predictive tools support resource allocation and help mitigate overcrowding by enabling proactive interventions before congestion occurs.

methodsData from a partner hospital's ED in the southeastern United States were used, integrating internal and external sources. Eleven different ML algorithms, ranging from traditional approaches to deep learning architectures, were systematically trained and evaluated on both hourly and daily predictions to determine the models that achieved the lowest prediction error. Experiments optimized feature combinations, and the best models were tested under high patient volume and across different hours to assess temporal accuracy.

resultsThe best hourly prediction performance was achieved by time series vision transformer plus (TSiTPlus) with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.19 and a mean squared error (MSE) of 29.36. The overall hourly waiting count had a mean of 18.11 and a SD (σ) of 9.77. Prediction accuracy varied by time of day, with the lowest MAE at 11 PM (2.45) and the highest at 8 PM (5.45). Extreme case analysis at (mean + 1σ), (mean + 2σ), and (mean + 3σ) resulted in MAEs of 6.16, 10.16, and 15.59, respectively. For daily predictions, an explainable convolutional neural network plus (XCMPlus) achieved the best results with an MAE of 2.00 and a MSE of 6.64. The daily waiting count had a mean of 18.11 and a SD of 4.51. Both models outperformed traditional forecasting approaches across multiple evaluation metrics.

conclusionsThe proposed prediction models effectively forecast ED waiting count at both hourly and daily intervals. The results demonstrate the value of integrating diverse data sources and applying advanced modeling techniques to support proactive resource allocation decisions. The implementation of these forecasting tools within hospital management systems has the potential to improve patient flow and reduce overcrowding in emergency care settings. The code is available in our GitHub repository.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCrowdingEmergency Service, HospitalForecastingHumansMachine LearningSoutheastern United StatesWaiting Listsemergency overcrowdinghospital resource managementpatient flow forecastingreactive and proactive full capacity protocoltime series prediction

Identifiers

PMID40961493
PMCPMC12489414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.