Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961488›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Collecting and Sharing Person-Centered AI Clinical Summaries Across Frailty Services Provided by the National Health Service and Voluntary, Community, and Social Enterprise: Protocol for a Co-Design and Feasibility Study.

Kieran Green, Sheena Asthana, Oscar Josue Ponce-Ponte, John Downey, Joanne Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kieran GreenCentre For Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3034-8329
Sheena AsthanaCentre For Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1483-2719
Oscar Josue Ponce-PonteMayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-8408
John DowneyCentre For Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8534-2437
Joanne WatsonTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4855-960X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to its association with multimorbidity, frailty gives rise to multidimensional needs for different services. Too often, patient preferences and service encounter information are not adequately shared.

objectiveThis developmental study aims to co-design, collect, and analyze encounter data from multiple community and primary-based multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) providing services for people with frailty to develop prototype large language models that can generate clinical and person-centered care summaries.

methodsEngaging stakeholders in 2 primary care networks, we will co-design the large language model to ensure it meets local needs and preferences as well as infrastructure, information governance, and regulation requirements. General practitioners will identify 50 patients with frailty requiring MDT engagement. Three consecutive encounters between the patients and different members of MDTs will then be audio-recorded. Recordings will be transcribed into text for concept design and model pretraining. These data combine stakeholder engagement insights to develop sensitive artificial intelligence (AI) models responding to stakeholders' needs, workflows, and preferences. To generate the person-centered summaries, we will test 2 approaches to modeling the encounter data: graph-based modeling and hierarchical transformers. The AI-generated summaries will be compared to human-written summaries of the same encounter data and assessed for accuracy, quality, fluency, and person-centeredness. They will also be shared with the original MDT members for validation. We will capture inputs, processes, and outcomes across all key phases of the implementation journey to identify capability requirements, determinants of implementation (including key challenges and best practices to overcome them), and the value added by the technology.

resultsThis protocol aims to review implementation evidence and engage stakeholders in co-design. This work package will aid the development of contextually sensitive, longitudinal, and AI-generated person-centered summarization tools. Model development will aim to achieve longitudinal person-centered summaries tested against MDT standards. If deemed suitable for deployment, optimum ways of integrating these summaries into shared care records will be explored with local key system leaders. Model evaluations will provide conclusive insights into such technologies' benefits and risks. As of August 2025, this study has not yet been funded, nor has ethical approval for the project been obtained. Consequently, dates of data collection and numbers of recruited participants are not applicable at this time.

conclusionsOur protocol provides a robust method of co-designing, evaluating, and implementing a longitudinal AI medical summary tool. Including key stakeholders at multiple stages facilitates an iterative development strategy that is designed to solve implementation challenges as they emerge. This project fits within our long-term vision to deliver a multimodal AI tool that saves clinicians time and deepens the health care professional-patient relationship. Future studies should include a larger patient sample, video-recorded health care professional-patient encounters, and a more extensive longitudinal evaluation. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/68511.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFrailtyAgedFeasibility StudiesHumansPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareResearch DesignAIartificial intelligencecare coordinationdata interoperability, person-centered care, multidisciplinary teamfuturehealth caremedical documentation

Identifiers

PMID40961488
PMCPMC12489409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.