Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961485›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Optimizing Digital Solutions to Improve Access to Comprehensive Primary Health Care Services in Remote Indigenous Communities: Protocol for a Participatory Action Research Project.

Vishnu Khanal, Emily Saurman, Deborah J Russell, Nicki Newton, Karina Coombes, Alexandar Puruntatameri, Sarah Norris, Amy von Huben, Tamsin Cockyane, Paul Burgess and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vishnu KhanalRemote Health Systems and Climate Change Centre, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3863-9913
Emily SaurmanSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6273-4769
Deborah J RussellRemote Health Systems and Climate Change Centre, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2221-7334
Nicki NewtonFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7015-0982
Karina CoombesRemote Health Systems and Climate Change Centre, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-6817-5577
Alexandar PuruntatameriRemote Health Systems and Climate Change Centre, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-7822-8063
Sarah NorrisLeeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-6906
Amy von HubenLeeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6168-9719
Tamsin CockyaneDepartment of Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1085-5320
Paul BurgessDepartment of Health, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7178-7419
John WakermanRemote Health Systems and Climate Change Centre, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8546-5434
Timothy ShawFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0783-1918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) peoples living in remote Australia experience a heavy burden of ill health and multiple barriers to accessing health care. Digital health technologies (DHTs) have the potential to help overcome some of these challenges and increase access to comprehensive primary health care (CPHC), thereby improving equity of health outcomes. However, little is known about the community and provider preferences for the use of digital technologies for improving health and wellness.

objectiveThe study aims to co-design, implement, and evaluate how DHTs can improve access to CPHC in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia.

methodsThis multiphased project will take a participatory action research approach to co-design and optimize digital health solutions with local community members and health service staff in 2 communities. Our mixed methods approach will include pre- and postimplementation focus group discussions, interviews, quantitative analysis of CPHC utilization administrative data, and surveys administered by Indigenous community-based researchers to understand the use of digital devices and connectivity, eHealth literacy, preferences for different attributes of DHTs using best-worst scaling, and consumer satisfaction and experiences with DHT interventions. Priority DHTs will be selected for implementation based on consumer and health staff preferences. Focus group discussions and interview data will explore community and health service staff preferences, experiences, and satisfaction with implemented DHTs. A realist approach will be taken to identify how DHT interventions work, for whom, and in what circumstances, so that the understanding of why some interventions work while others do not is expanded. Economic analyses will be conducted to calculate the incremental costs and benefits of implemented DHT interventions. The scalability of digital health solutions will be tested in two additional communities. Project partners include key funding, service, and support agencies in the NT and nationally.

resultsAs of November 2024, we have selected two implementation sites. Digital health initiatives are underway at the implementation sites, and evaluation activities are progressing. The initial findings from these sites have informed our scalability assessment in an additional two sites.

conclusionsKnowledge translation is integral to the study design, which involves partnering with consumers, CPHC service providers, and a range of key stakeholders to inform health service providers and policy makers about which DHTs work for which groups of consumers, and under what circumstances, to improve access to CPHC. This unique study will accommodate consumer and provider preferences regarding the use of DHTs to improve CPHC access and address the lack of knowledge about how to deploy digital solutions to best support CPHC in remote Indigenous Australia. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/68892.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services, IndigenousPrimary Health CareAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansNorthern TerritoryTelemedicineaccessco-designdigital healthIndigenous healthIndigenous peoplesparticipatory action researchprimary health careremotetelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40961485
PMCPMC12489406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.