ArticleJCO precision oncology2025
Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Predicting Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer: A Chinese Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInternal iliac and obturator lymph nodes are common sites of metastasis in rectal cancer. This study developed a machine learning (ML) model using clinical data to predict lymph node metastasis and applied the Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) method for interpretation. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospectively, data from patients with rectal cancer at four Chinese centers-who underwent total mesorectal excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection without neoadjuvant therapy-were collected. Two centers provided training/test sets (3:1 ratio) and two centers supplied external validation. Lymph node enlargement was determined by imaging and confirmed by pathology. Five ML models were evaluated by AUC, accuracy, and F1 score. Key features included demographics, tumor stage, tumor-to-anal verge distance, imaging measurements, tumor histological differentiation, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. SHAP was used to assess feature importance.
resultsOf the 411 cases (174 positives) in the training/test sets and 109 cases (43 positives) in external validation, the random forest (RF) model ranked second in terms of AUC and accuracy in the training set (0.999, 0.995), whereas it achieved the highest AUC and accuracy (0.877 and 0.788) in the test set. In the external validation, the RF model outperformed all other ML models (AUC of 0.899, accuracy of 0.827). Overall, the RF model demonstrates the superior overall performance. According to the SHAP analysis, the most important predictors of internal iliac and obturator lymph node metastasis were, in descending order, the short-axis diameter of enlarged lymph nodes, regional lymph node metastasis, and tumor-to-anal verge distance. At the individual patient level, SHAP force plots provided explanations of the RF model predictions for internal iliac and obturator lymph node metastasis.
conclusionAn interpretable ML model was developed that accurately predicts internal iliac and obturator lymph node metastasis using clinical data. SHAP analysis enhances understanding of feature contributions, supporting personalized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.