Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961370›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

A Design Thinking Approach for Transnational Adaptation of 2 Mobile Mental Health Apps: Tutorial for Researchers and Practitioners.

Sylvie Bernaerts, Tom Van Daele, Christian Korthé Carlsen, Søren Lange Nielsen, Jolanda Schaap, Yvette Roke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sylvie BernaertsPsychology and Technology, Centre of Expertise Care and Well-being, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Campus Sanderus, Molenstraat 8, Antwerp, 2018, Belgium, 003234324050.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4933-8283
Tom Van DaelePsychology and Technology, Centre of Expertise Care and Well-being, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Campus Sanderus, Molenstraat 8, Antwerp, 2018, Belgium, 003234324050.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-9297
Christian Korthé CarlsenCentre for Digital Psychiatry, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1761-7963
Søren Lange NielsenCentre for Digital Psychiatry, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2901-5208
Jolanda SchaapExpertise Center for Autism Spectrum Disorder, GGz centraal, Almere, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5549-6701
Yvette RokeExpertise Center for Autism Spectrum Disorder, GGz centraal, Almere, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0112-5862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Digital mental health solutions have great potential to enhance mental health care. However, barriers at the level of users, interventions, and context hinder engagement and uptake. Involving users in the design, adaptation, and implementation process has been put forward as a potential solution; however, instructions and examples on how to do so are limited. One potential framework is design thinking. Although design thinking is a common approach in the business community, its use for guiding development and adaptation processes is not yet a common practice in the context of digital mental health. Unsurprisingly, it is difficult to find concrete instructions on how to do this, even more so in an international context. Therefore, the SUPER (Successful User Participation Examples and Recommendations) project aimed to develop guidelines for entrepreneurs and mental health organizations on how to involve end users and mental health care professionals in the transnational development, implementation, and adaptation of mental health technology. This paper describes the design thinking process that led to those guidelines and how these can be undertaken by researchers, practitioners, or developers in the context of digital mental health. The process is illustrated with 2 adaptations of digital mental health solutions following this approach, executed by the SUPER consortium in the Netherlands and in Denmark. The learnings from these 2 pilots are provided in the form of key considerations and highlights of issues experienced during both design thinking processes. The overall aim is to guide practitioners, developers, and researchers toward better development and international adaptation of digital mental health.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesMobile ApplicationsDenmarkHumansNetherlandsTelemedicinedesign thinkingdigital mental healthend-user involvementmobile phone appstransnational upscalinguser participation

Identifiers

PMID40961370
PMCPMC12443347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.