Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961369›Full record

Trial reportJMIR medical education2025

Integrated e-Learning for Shoulder Anatomy and Clinical Examination Skills in First-Year Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Roland Koch, Lena Gassner, Navina Gerlach, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Bernhard Hirt, Stefanie Joos, Thomas Shiozawa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roland KochInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, Tübingen, 72076, Germany, 49 1758065961.ORCID 0000-0002-6500-928X
Lena GassnerInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, Tübingen, 72076, Germany, 49 1758065961.ORCID 0009-0002-4829-7918
Navina GerlachInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, Tübingen, 72076, Germany, 49 1758065961.ORCID 0000-0003-2236-9637
Teresa Festl-WietekTIME - Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, Medical Faculty, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1450-1757
Bernhard HirtDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-7191
Stefanie JoosInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, Tübingen, 72076, Germany, 49 1758065961.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-529X
Thomas ShiozawaDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7112-1016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Applying functional anatomy to clinical examination techniques in shoulder examination is challenging for physicians at all learning stages. Anatomy teaching has shifted toward a more function-oriented approach and has increasingly incorporated e-learning. There is limited evidence on whether the integrated teaching of professionalism, clinical examination technique, and functional anatomy via e-learning is effective. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of an integrated blended learning course on the ability of first-year medical students to perform a shoulder examination on healthy volunteers. Methods: Based on Kolb's experiential learning theory, we designed a course on shoulder anatomy and clinical examination techniques that integrates preclinical and clinical content across all 4 stages of Kolb's learning cycle. The study is a randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial involving first-year medical students who are assigned to one of two groups. Both groups participated in blended learning courses; however, the intervention group's course combined clinical examination, anatomy, and professional behavior and included a peer-assisted practice session as well as a flipped classroom seminar. The control group's course combined an online lecture with self-study and self-examination. After completing the course, participants uploaded a video of their shoulder examination. The videos were scored by 2 blinded raters using a standardized examination checklist with a total score of 40. Results: Thirty-eight medical students were included from the 80 participants needed based on the power calculation. Seventeen intervention and 14 control students completed the 3-week study. The intervention group students scored a mean of 34.71 (SD 1.99). The control students scored a mean of 29.43 (SD 5.13). The difference of means was 5.3 points and proved to be statistically significant (P<.001; 2-sided Mann-Whitney U test). Conclusions: The study shows that anatomy, professional behavior, and clinical examination skills can also be taught in an integrated blended learning approach. For first-year medical students, this approach proved more effective than online lectures and self-study.

Indexed as

AnatomyClinical CompetenceComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceEducation, Medical, UndergraduatePhysical ExaminationShoulderStudents, MedicalAdultCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleblended learningclinical examinationfunctional anatomyintegrated learningrandomized controlled trialundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID40961369
PMCPMC12443353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.