ArticleTrends in hearing
Externalization of Virtual Sound Sources With Bone and Air Conduction Stimulation.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current research on sound source externalization primarily focuses on air conduction (AC). As bone conduction (BC) technology advances and BC headphones become more common, the perception of externalization for BC-generated virtual sound sources has emerged as an area of significant interest. However, there remains a shortage of relevant research in this domain. The current study investigates the impact of reverberant sound components on the perception of externalization for BC virtual sound sources, both with the ear open (BC-open) and with the ear canals occluded (BC-blocked). To modify the reverberant components of the Binaural Room Impulse Responses (BRIRs), the BRIRs were either truncated or had their reverberation energy scaled. The experimental findings suggest that the perception of externalization does not significantly differ across the three stimulation modalities: AC, BC-open, and BC-blocked. Across both AC and BC transmission modes, the perception of externalization for virtual sound sources was primarily influenced by the reverberation present in the contralateral ear. The results were consistent between the BC-open and BC-blocked conditions, indicating that air radiated sounds from the BC transducer did not impact the results. Regression analyses indicated that under AC stimulation, sound source externalization ratings exhibited strong linear relationships with the Direct-to-Reverberant Energy Ratio (DRR), Frequency-to-Frequency Variability (FFV), and Interaural Coherence (IC). The results suggests that BC transducers provide a similar degree of sound source externalization as AC headphones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.