Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961254›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Multispecies Coexistence Emerges From Pairwise Exclusions in Communities With Competitive Hierarchy.

Zachary R Miller, Dillon Max

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary R MillerDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Dillon MaxDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6303-001X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive coexistence is often understood as an additive process where coexisting species pairs, triplets, etc. combine to form larger communities. However, emergent coexistence-where multispecies persistence occurs without pairwise coexistence-can arise through mechanisms including intransitive loops, facilitation, or higher-order interactions. Emergent coexistence has functional consequences, for example constraining community assembly and reducing robustness to extinctions. Here, we demonstrate that emergent coexistence can arise without intransitivity in competitive communities with pairwise interactions. First, we develop a simple trade-off model where interactions are competitive, transitive, and pairwise, yet coexistence is emergent. Second, we show that coexistence is typically emergent in well-known hierarchical trade-off models. Third, we find that emergent coexistence frequently occurs without pronounced intransitivity in random model communities. Our results suggest that competitive coexistence may often be emergent, highlighting a need to better understand the mechanisms and prevalence of this phenomenon in order to reliably predict community assembly, robustness, and biodiversity maintenance.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemModels, BiologicalCompetitive BehaviorPopulation Dynamicsassembly rulescoexistencecommunity assemblycompetition‐colonisation trade‐offcompetitive hierarchyemergent coexistence

Identifiers

PMID40961254
PMCPMC12443417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.