Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961204›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

How musicality enhances top-down and bottom-up selective attention: Insights from precise separation of simultaneous neural responses.

Cassia Low Manting, Dimitrios Pantazis, John Gabrieli, Daniel Lundqvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cassia Low MantingMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9339-3402
Dimitrios PantazisMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
John GabrieliMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Daniel LundqvistDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1593-2559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural environments typically contain a blend of simultaneous sounds. A substantial challenge in neuroscience is identifying specific neural signals corresponding to each sound and analyzing them separately. Combining frequency tagging and machine learning, we achieved high-precision separation of neural responses to mixed melodies, classifying them by selective attention toward specific melodies. Across two magnetoencephalography datasets, individual musicality and task performance heavily influenced the attentional recruitment of cortical regions, correlating positively with top-down attention in the left parietal cortex but negatively with bottom-up attention in the right. In prefrontal areas, neural responses indicating higher sustained selective attention reflected better performance and musicality. These results suggest that musical training enhances neural mechanisms in the frontoparietal regions, boosting performance via improving top-down attention, reducing bottom-up distractions, and maintaining selective attention over time. This work establishes the effectiveness of combining frequency tagging with machine learning to capture cognitive and behavioral effects with stimulus precision, applicable to other studies involving simultaneous stimuli.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionMusicAcoustic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetoencephalographyMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40961204
PMCPMC12442866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.