ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Ligands binding diffusively to protein target act as inhibitors of protein-protein interactions.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence from capsid protein of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) binds to importin-α transport protein and clogs nuclear import. Prevention of viral NLS binding to importin-α may represent a viable therapeutic route. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanism by which two diffusively binding inhibitors, DP9 and DP9o, interfere with the binding of VEEV's NLS peptide to importin-α. Our study uses all-atom replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations, which probe the competitive binding of the VEEV NLS fragment, the coreNLS peptide, and the inhibitors to importin-α. Our previous simulations of non-competitive binding of the coreNLS, in which it natively binds to importin-α, are used as a reference. Both inhibitors abrogate native peptide binding and reduce the fraction of its native interactions, but they fail to prevent its non-native binding to importin-α. As a result, these inhibitors turn the coreNLS into diffusive binder, which adopts a manifold of non-native binding poses. Competition from the inhibitors compromises the free energy of coreNLS binding to importin-α showing that they reduce its binding affinity. The inhibition mechanism is based on masking the native binding interactions formed by the coreNLS amino acids. Surprisingly, ligand interference with the binding interactions formed by importin-α amino acids contributes little to inhibition. We show that DP9 is a stronger inhibitor than DP9o. By comparative analysis of DP9 and DP9o interactions we determine the atomistic reason for a relative "success" of DP9, which is due to the intercalation of this inhibitor between the side chains of NLS lysine residues. To test our simulations, we performed AlphaScreen experiments measuring IC50 values for the inhibitors. AlphaScreen data confirmed in silico ranking of the inhibitors. By combining our recent studies, we discuss the putative mechanism by which diffusively binding inhibitors impact protein-protein interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.