Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961114›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Personalized education approach based on cognitive psychology for endoscopic diagnosis: A multicenter randomized trial.

Kentaro Mochida, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Masamichi Yuzawa, Daisuke Suto, Toshihiro Nishizawa, Yasunari Sakamoto, Mikinori Kataoka, Mitsuru Esaki, Chika Kusano, Takuji Gotoda and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kentaro MochidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Fumiaki IshibashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-7958
Masamichi YuzawaHiroshima University, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Daisuke SutoDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Toshihiro NishizawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yasunari SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare Atami Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Mikinori KataokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuru EsakiDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Chika KusanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takuji GotodaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi KondaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun ArimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryu TanakaDigestive Diseases Center, Shinjuku Tsurukame Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei YamanouchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Takagi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masao OkuboDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sanno Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuma FujimotoInternational University of Health and Welfare Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro KawakamiEndoscopy Center, Koganei Tsurukame Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Mizuki NagaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Sho SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-1409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The learning curve for endoscopic diagnosis varies, and an optimal educational strategy is not available. Working memory (WM) refers to an individual's ability to store and process information quickly and simultaneously. This study aimed to determine whether educational methods, optimized by individual WM, facilitate learning about endoscopic diagnoses. In the development phase, the standard WM profile for general endoscopists was determined by 79 endoscopists. In the validation phase, 60 trainees from four Japanese institutions were assessed for visuospatial or verbal WM dominance, based on the standard WM profile, and randomly assigned to receive matched (Matched-E group) or unmatched (Unmatched-E group) education. In the Matched-E group, the visuospatial and verbal WM-dominant trainees learned the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps by pattern recognition and through the description text of narrow-band imaging classification, respectively. In the Unmatched-E group, participants received education that was opposite to their dominant WM type. The diagnostic accuracy of the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps was compared between the groups after each educational session. Among the 60 trainees, 40 (21 in Matched-E and 19 in Unmatched-E) completed the validation test. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the Matched-E group than that in the Unmatched-E group (61.6% vs. 53.9%, P = 0.008). The diagnostic accuracy for non-neoplastic lesions was higher in the Matched-E group than that in the Unmatched-E group (68.0% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.002), whereas it did not differ for adenoma, intramucosal cancer, or invasive cancer. The personalized education based on the WM profile facilitated learning endoscopic diagnosis.

Indexed as

CognitionColonic PolypsColonoscopyAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansJapanMaleMemory, Short-Term

Identifiers

PMID40961114
PMCPMC12443239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.