Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961110›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Democratizing social media for health research: LLM-powered data analytics platform for NCDs.

Ratchanont Thippimanporn, Wuttichai Khamna, Kannika Wiratchawa, Thanapong Intharah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ratchanont ThippimanpornVisual Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
Wuttichai KhamnaVisual Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
Kannika WiratchawaVisual Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
Thanapong IntharahVisual Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-680X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite over 41 million annual deaths from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) globally, predominantly in low and middle-income countries, public access to relevant information from social media is hindered by restrictive licensing of existing social listening tools. This study introduces NCDs Listener, an open-source tool designed to simplify the extraction, summarization, and visualization of NCD-related knowledge from social media comments (Facebook and Reddit posts) in both English and Thai. The tool utilizes keyword matching and the BERT model for knowledge extraction, followed by descriptive statistical analysis. A generative AI model, specifically Google Gemini 2.0 Flash as per the saved information, summarizes this extracted knowledge into human-readable sentences, focusing on medical and healthcare insights. Preliminary results indicate that NCDs Listener improves dashboard comprehension for both general users and data scientists, with the general users showing higher comprehension. Furthermore, both user groups preferred medically focused generative AI summaries over general summaries (p-value <0.001). These findings suggest that NCDs Listener not only provides immediate insights but also establishes a foundation for advanced data analysis, fostering new opportunities for understanding complex social phenomena and predicting emerging trends. The source codes are available at the project page: https://ratchanontt.github.io/NCDsListenerWebpage/.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesSocial MediaData AnalyticsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40961110
PMCPMC12443273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.