ArticlePloS one2025
Explaining solar forecasts with generative AI: A two-stage framework combining transformers and LLMs.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and interpretable solar power forecasting is critical for effectively integrating Photo-Voltaic (PV) systems into modern energy infrastructure. This paper introduces a novel two-stage hybrid framework that couples deep learning-based time series prediction with generative Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance forecast accuracy and model interpretability. At its core, the proposed SolarTrans model leverages a lightweight Transformer-based encoder-decoder architecture tailored for short-term DC power prediction using multivariate inverter and weather data, including irradiance, ambient and module temperatures, and temporal features. Experiments conducted on publicly available datasets from two PV plants over 34 days demonstrate strong predictive performance. The SolarTrans model achieves a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.0782 and 0.1544, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.1760 and 0.4424, and R2 scores of 0.9692 and 0.7956 on Plant 1 and Plant 2, respectively. On the combined dataset, the model yields an MAE of 0.1105, RMSE of 0.3189, and R2 of 0.8967. To address the interpretability challenge, we fine-tuned the Flan-T5 model on structured prompts derived from domain-informed templates and forecast outputs. The resulting explanation module achieves ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L, and ROUGE-Lsum scores of 0.7889, 0.7211, 0.7759, and 0.7771, respectively, along with a BLEU score of 0.6558, indicating high-fidelity generation of domain-relevant natural language explanations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.