ArticlePloS one2025
The Social Stress Indicator (SSI).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media shapes perceptions, influences emotions, and fuels anxieties, yet its true impact on social stress remains difficult to measure. This study introduces the Social Stress Indicator (SSI) as a computational tool for quantifying social stress in real time by integrating sentiment analysis (SA), subjectivity (SUB), and information seeking behavior (ISB). The data used was synthetic, and no-real world data was used to test the context. To validate SSI, it was compared to an expert-labeled Social Stress Score (SSS), which assesses sentiment negativity, anxiety expression, engagement, misinformation, and help-seeking behavior. Results show that SSI moderately aligns with SSS but underestimates stress levels, especially during high-intensity events. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed a negative bias, suggesting SSI struggles to capture extreme stress. However, causality tests indicate SSI has predictive power, making it a potential early warning system for stress-related trends. Despite its promise, SSI faces limitations in detecting misinformation surges, crisis-driven anxiety, and nuanced social interactions. This study demonstrates the feasibility of computationally tracking social stress at scale but highlights the need for refinements. Future improvements should enhance sensitivity to extreme stressors, incorporate adaptive thresholding, and integrate contextual signals like network effects and linguistic nuances. This research advances infodemic intelligence, with implications for mental health monitoring, policy-making, and digital governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.