ArticlePloS one2025
Using virtual reality to study preference and restorativeness for streetscape vegetation design.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of small urban green spaces, such as streetscape vegetation, plays a significant role in the daily exposure to nature for a considerable proportion of urban inhabitants across the globe. This study examines how specific design elements (vegetal and non-vegetal) of small urban green spaces influence human preferences and their alignment with perceived restorativeness dimensions. In each of the 30 trials, participants selected their preferred option and gave reasons for their choice based on the four aspects of the Attention Restoration Theory (fascination, coherence, being away, compatibility). The results demonstrate that the absence of a fence was the most preferred option, irrespective of the fence type. Shorter fences and fences that include greenery were found to be significantly more favored than other types, primarily due to the factor of fascination. Conversely, attributes such as metal and high fences were selected less frequently, with coherence identified as the primary reason for this preference. The most preferred vegetation type was trees, which were selected primarily due to their capacity to evoke fascination. In contrast, bushes and grass, which were less favored, were chosen for their contribution to coherence. A medium level of diversity was preferred over high or low levels when the arrangement of vegetation was not regular. Furthermore, random and regular arrangements were less favored than an intermediate level of arrangement. With regard to the Attention Restoration Theory dimensions, fascination was the primary motive for all options except for the regular arrangement. These findings could assist designers of small urban green spaces in creating more restorative environments. Additionally, the study illustrates the value of employing virtual environments in environmental preference research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.