Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40961029›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Recovery of benthic macroinfauna six years after dredging.

David Samuel Johnson, Manisha Pant, Andrew Nemeth, Emelie Foster, Adam Gartelman, Stacy Calhoun-Grosch, Kehui Xu, Brian J Roberts, James Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David Samuel JohnsonVirginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7898-4893
Manisha PantVirginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia, United States of America.
Andrew NemethVirginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia, United States of America.
Emelie FosterDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Adam GartelmanCoastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Stacy Calhoun-GroschLouisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, Louisiana, United Stataes of America.
Kehui XuCoastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Brian J RobertsLouisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, Louisiana, United Stataes of America.
James NelsonDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In soft-sediment communities, benthic macroinfauna can recover quickly (sometimes < 1 year) from dredging. However, it's unclear how recovery is influenced if dredging dramatically changes abiotic factors. We determined recovery of benthic macroinfauna from dredging on a sandy shoal (Ship Shoal, Louisiana, USA), six years after dredging. Because the dredged area infilled with mud instead of sand and changed local abiotic conditions, we hypothesized that the benthic community had not recovered. Our results support this hypothesis. Although the dredged community had, on average, 160% greater density and 170% greater macroinfaunal biomass than the reference community, these increases were driven by the opportunistic and seasonally variable dwarf clam, Mulinia lateralis. Community structure differed starkly between the regions. Haustoriid amphipods and amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae) dominated the reference community. However, these taxa were largely absent from the dredged community, which was dominated by opportunistic species such as M. lateralis and the fringe-gilled mudworm Paraprionospio pinnata. Community differences were largely driven by bottom-water dissolved oxygen and sediment grain size. Our results suggest that the dredged areas are still in a transitional phase of recovery after six years - dominated by opportunistic, hypoxia-tolerant species. Our results suggest that abiotic factors such as grain size and hypoxia are important in structuring benthic communities and their recovery rates. Thus, to achieve faster recovery of the biological community, dredging should be conducted in a way that minimizes long-term impacts on abiotic conditions.

Indexed as

BivalviaAmphipodaAnimalsBiodiversityBiomassEcosystemGeologic SedimentsLouisiana

Identifiers

PMID40961029
PMCPMC12443283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.