ArticlePacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE2025
When Legacy Triumphs: Resolving Leadless Pacemaker Programming Failure Caused by Loop Recorder Interference.
Article in Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Legacy Triumphs: Resolving Leadless Pacemaker Programming Failure Caused by Loop Recorder Interference.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Article
- Single-shot AF ablation, Leadless pacemakers and LAAO are EP, not IC procedures.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing prevalence of co-implanted cardiac electronic devices increases the potential for clinically significant interactions. We describe the case of an 81-year-old man with a Biotronik BIOMONITOR IV implantable loop recorder (ILR) who required a Medtronic MICRA VR leadless pacemaker. Post-implantation, interrogation with the modern Medtronic SmartSync programmer failed due to suspected electromagnetic interference from the ILR. Communication was successfully established using the older Medtronic CareLink 2090 programmer. This report highlights a unique instance of inter-device interference, underscoring the importance of understanding programmer technology and device compatibility in complex clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.