ArticleJAMA dermatology2025
Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- What's New in Photoprotection?American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Clinical Equipoise and Unimproved Outcomes following Posttransplant Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Nutrition Information Briefs - Niacin.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Skin Cancer Prevention and Antiaging: Role of Nicotinamide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Skin Cancer in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention: The Jury Was Out and Still is.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Photoprotection for Skin Cancer: What's New.Cancers · 2026Review
- Chemoprevention in Skin Cancer: What Advice?Cancers · 2026Review
- Oral Nicotinamide for the Secondary Prevention of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Other Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review.Journal of skin cancer · 2026Review
- Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas in a Long-Term Survivor of Childhood ALL and HSCT-A Call for Dermatologic Vigilance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Error in Figure 4.JAMA dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Nicotinamide supplementation has been studied as a chemopreventive medication for reducing skin cancer risk, but large-scale data are limited. Objective: To determine the clinical efficacy of nicotinamide supplementation for skin cancer prevention in the general population and among solid organ transplant recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health record data (October 1, 1999, to December 31, 2024) from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) of 33 822 patients. Analyses were conducted from January 17, 2025, to May 9, 2025. Patients who were exposed to nicotinamide were propensity score matched based on the number and year of skin cancers after which treatment with nicotinamide was initiated, age, sex, self-reported race, exposure to acitretin, exposure to field therapy, history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and history of solid organ transplant. The index date was the first prescription of nicotinamide filled within the VA system. Stratified Cox models were used to investigate the association of nicotinamide with skin cancer development. Exposures: Nicotinamide, 500 mg, twice daily for longer than 30 days as documented in the electronic health record. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to the next skin cancer after baseline. Results: There were 12 287 patients (mean [SD] age, 77.2 [8.9] years; 241 women [2.0%]; 31 [0.3%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 3 [<0.1%] Asian, 13 [0.1%] Black or African American, 59 [0.5%] Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 11 662 [94.9%] White individuals) exposed to oral nicotinamide, 500 mg, twice daily for longer than 30 days who were matched to 21 479 unexposed patients (mean [SD] age, 76.9 [8.7] years; 374 women [2.0%]; 49 [0.2%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 3 [<0.1%] Asian, 16 [0.1%] Black or African American, 88 [0.4%] Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 20 517 [95.3%] White individuals). Within the matched dataset, there were 10 994 instances of basal cell carcinoma after nicotinamide exposure and 12 551 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). A total of 1334 (3.9%) in the matched cohort were solid organ transplant recipients. Overall, there was a significant 14% reduction in skin cancer risk. When nicotinamide was initiated after a first skin cancer, the risk reduction rose to 54%, although this benefit declined with initiation following subsequent skin cancers. This risk reduction was seen for skin cancers overall, basal cell carcinoma, and cSCC, with the greatest risk reduction seen for cSCC. Among solid organ transplant recipients, no overall significant risk reduction was observed, although early nicotinamide use was associated with reduced cSCC incidence. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that there is a decreased risk of skin cancer among patients treated with nicotinamide, with the greatest effect seen when initiated after the first skin cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.