Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40960803›Full record

ReviewJAMA psychiatry2025

Reductions in World Health Organization Risk Drinking Levels as a Primary Efficacy End Point for Alcohol Clinical Trials: A Review.

Katie Witkiewitz, Raymond F Anton, Stephanie S O'Malley, Deborah S Hasin, Bernard L Silverman, Arnie Aldridge, Karl Mann, Alcohol Clinical Trials Initiative (ACTIVE) Workgroup

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Alcohol harms: the need for prevention and treatment.European journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katie WitkiewitzCenter on Alcohol, Substance use, And Addictions (CASAA), University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Raymond F AntonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Stephanie S O'MalleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Deborah S HasinDepartment of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Bernard L SilvermanChief Medical Officer, Nirsum Laboratories, New York, New York.
Arnie AldridgeBehavioral Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Karl MannCentral Institute for Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Alcohol Clinical Trials Initiative (ACTIVE) Workgroup

Funding

Precision Medicine and Recovery in a Telehealth Treatment Program for Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA022328 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2013 to 2026
$3.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a highly prevalent and costly psychiatric disorder. Abstinence has been considered the optimal outcome of treatment for AUD. Yet, most individuals with AUD do not seek treatment because they do not have a goal of abstinence. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently qualified reductions in drinking, defined by at least a 2-level reduction in the World Health Organization risk drinking levels (WHO RDLs), as a primary end point for alcohol pharmacotherapy trials. The approval of drinking reductions as an end point for alcohol clinical trials aligns with an accumulating literature on drinking reductions in the alcohol field. This article provides a narrative review of 34 articles that have examined WHO RDLs as a surrogate marker of how people with AUD feel and function. Observations: Results from epidemiological studies, community samples, and clinical trials indicate that drinking reductions are associated with improvements in how patients feel and function, including reduced risk of substance use disorder and medical and psychiatric diseases and reductions in alcohol-related consequences, craving, and health care costs. Drinking reductions are also associated with improvements in functioning and quality of life. Drinking reductions are also achieved by most clinical trial participants, and effect sizes for the WHO RDL reductions for active medications vs placebo are similar to or better than alternative end points. Conclusions and Relevance: The FDA acceptance of reduction in WHO RDLs as a primary end point for alcohol clinical trials may increase opportunities for AUD medications development, encourage patients to seek treatments that target drinking reductions, and engage clinicians in prescribing medications shown to be effective in supporting drinking reductions. The WHO RDLs may be particularly useful for targeted drinking reductions in clinical practice. Qualification of the WHO RDL end point facilitates a paradigm shift toward a harm reduction approach in AUD treatment.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholismClinical Trials as TopicHumansUnited StatesWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID40960803
PMCPMC12739655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.