Observational studyEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2025
Analysis of mortality of users treated at a Mobile Emergency Care Service: an observational study, Paraná, 2019-2020.
Observational study in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the mortality of users attended by a Mobile Emergency Care Service located in Paraná.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional analytical study based on service reports from 2019 and 2020. The Mobile Emergency Care Service covered 21 municipalities, divided into hubs A and B. The dependent variables defined were death and time of care. Survival functions were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test; hazard ratio (HR) for death, by Cox regression with 95% confidence interval (95%CI).
resultsThe study evaluated 13,326 instances of care provided. Of these, 246 resulted in death. The risk of death was higher in time-sensitive calls (HR 0.17; 95%CI 0.008; 0.37), in 2020 (HR 2.09; 95%CI 1.39; 3.16), attended by advanced support (HR 21.51; 95%CI 12.61; 36.70) and in Hub B (HR 4.26; 95%CI 2.53; 7.17).
conclusionMortality was higher in cases that had a long wait for time-sensitive calls, occurred in less populated regions, and were dealt with by advanced support in 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.