ArticleCritical care science2025
Competency-based education in intensive care multiprofessional training: a scoping review.
Article in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo map the development and implementation of competency-based education in intensive care multiprofessional training on the basis of national and international literature.
methodsA scoping review was conducted with searches in six databases and gray literature.
resultsThe initial search identified 1,636 potentially eligible records, and 31 studies were included in the final sample. The data were grouped into three themes: development of competency-based education, implementation of competency-based education in curricula, continuing education and training programs, and student assessment. The studies were published between 2000 and 2024 and focused primarily on medical education, with a predominance of publications from North America and Europe. Heterogeneity was identified in the conceptual strategies of competency-based education, with an initial focus on skill lists evolving into core competencies, milestones, and entrustable professional activities. Benefits such as transparency in the learning process, individualized tracking, and the promotion of reflective learning were identified. Challenges to implementing effective competency-based education include the need for faculty training, resistance to change, a lack of time and resources, and the development of more robust assessment tools. The lack of studies on competency-based education in Latin America and the reduced number of studies in other health fields, such as nursing and physiotherapy, were highlighted.
conclusionCompetency-based education appears promising for training in intensive care; however, further research is needed to assess its impact on quality of care and patient safety, as well as to broaden the discussion to include diverse contexts and health fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.