Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40960625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Fact-finding with fungi: A scoping review on recent advancements in the role of fungi as evidence in forensic science.

Dhatri V Karanth, Arjun Rao Isukapatla

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dhatri V KaranthDepartment of Life Sciences, Christ University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-2952
Arjun Rao IsukapatlaDepartment of Life Sciences, Christ University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. arjun.rao@christuniversity.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-468X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungi are important decomposers aiding in recycling of organic matter. The use of fungi in forensic settings has grown in popularity in the recent years, due to its diverse applications.

objectiveThis scoping review seeks to compile the advances in using fungi as evidence and identify current trends in the workflow of fungal applications in forensic science.

designWeb of Science, Scopus and PubMed databases were used to find relevant literature published during the years of 2005-2025. Eighty-one articles were identified as they fit the eligibility criteria of the review.

resultFungi growing on a cadaver can aid in identifying the stage of decomposition and approximate estimation of time since death, while alteration of soil fungal community due to decomposition can help in post-burial interval assessment. Fungal spores are effective as trace evidences to locate primary and secondary crime scenes, using either dust or soil, by integrating DNA metabarcoding and statistical approaches. However, fungi can also alter evidence, such as in hair, body fluids and drugs.

conclusionResearch has established fungi as one of the most robust pieces of evidence. Research should be conducted on refining the methodologies and considering the various factors which can affect fungal growth.

Indexed as

Forensic SciencesFungiPostmortem ChangesHumansSoil MicrobiologySpores, FungalDecompositionForensic mycologyFungiGeolocationHallucinogenicPost-mortem intervalTrace evidence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.