ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Bioactive glass products for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a scoping review.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of S-PRG-based varnish and bioactive glass-based air polishing in the management of dentin hypersensitivity and their effects on tooth color: a 12-month randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Longevity of different in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity: A 6-month randomized and parallel clinical trial.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics consensus statement on bioceramics in conservative dentistry and endodontics.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Article
- Dentin Hypersensitivity Treated With Diode Laser and Aminefluoride: A Randomized Clinical Trial.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically map and synthesize the current scientific evidence on the active ingredients and effectiveness of bioactive glass-containing products for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, and to identify knowledge gaps. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2025. Studies of any evidence level investigating bioactive glasses, bioactive glass-ceramics, or related products for dentin hypersensitivity treatment, evaluating parameters like dentinal tubule occlusion, dental remineralization, or pain relief, were included. Descriptive analysis was applied to all included studies.
resultsA total of 72 studies were reviewed, primarily in vitro (n = 46), with randomized clinical trials (n = 17) and reviews (n = 9) also represented. Calcium sodium phosphosilicate was the most analyzed bioactive glass (n = 33), often compared with arginine, nano-hydroxyapatite, potassium nitrate, and strontium acetate formulations. Products were commonly presented as toothpaste (n = 39), powder (n = 14), and gel (n = 6). In vitro studies frequently reported benefits in dentinal tubule occlusion, predominantly assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Clinical studies demonstrated reductions in dentin hypersensitivity-related pain, commonly assessed using air jet or cold-water stimuli combined with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores or the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale (SCSS), with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 11 weeks.
conclusionToothpaste containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate was the most extensively studied bioactive glass-based product for dentin hypersensitivity treatment, with in vitro evidence supporting its effectiveness. Additional clinical research is needed to confirm these findings. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Bioactive glass products show promise in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Given the variability in composition, evidence-based selection is key to ensuring effective treatment and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40960555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.