ArticleThoracic research and practice2025
A Novel Approach to High-flow Nasal Oxygen Delivery: Physiological and Clinical Perspectives on Asymmetrical Cannulas.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heated High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Physiology, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Physical and Physiological Mechanisms of Emergent Hydrodynamic Pressure in High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has become an essential therapeutic modality across a broad spectrum of indications, and it is currently regarded as the optimal initial therapeutic option for patients presenting with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. A novel HFNC interface with an asymmetrical cannula has recently been introduced to optimize the physiological benefits of HFNC. It features prongs, one with a smaller diameter and another with a larger diameter, to enhance positive end-expiratory pressure and carbon dioxide washout. This is achieved by modulating the prong-to-nare area ratio to maintain a balance between airway pressure and dead space clearance. Recent studies have indicated that the use of an asymmetrical design may result in enhanced upper airway pressure and dead space washout. Asymmetrical cannulas may enhance patient comfort, reduce work of breathing, and lower minute ventilation. However, they do not significantly differ from standard cannulas in terms of gas exchange, oxygenation, diaphragm activity, lung compliance, dorsal fraction of ventilation, or lung impedance. Further research is needed to determine whether asymmetrical cannulas offer clinical advantages in specific patient populations, to identify optimal sizing parameters, and to assess their long-term safety and efficacy in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.