Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40960292›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Testing the priming effect in the deep ocean: are microorganisms too starved to consume recalcitrant organic carbon?

Richard LaBrie, Corday R Selden, Nagissa Mahmoudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard LaBrieDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1681-4888
Corday R SeldenDepartment of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5721-3061
Nagissa MahmoudiDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9118-4180

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NFRFE-2019-00794Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-04228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep ocean dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is one of the largest pools of reduced carbon on Earth. Many DOC compounds escape microbial degradation and persist for thousands of years in the ocean. Although many hypotheses have been proposed, the mechanisms responsible for this long-term stability remain unresolved. Heterotrophic microorganisms in the deep ocean are energetically starved and exhibit low metabolic activity. Here, we investigated whether the severe energy limitation in deep-sea environments acts as a barrier to microbial degradation of DOC. We hypothesized that alleviating this energetic barrier through the addition of labile compounds (i.e., the priming effect) could stimulate microbial consumption of DOC. We conducted 62-day bottle incubations with deep seawater from the Southern Ocean that were amended with simple organic carbon, nitrogen, and/or phosphorus-containing compounds. We tracked DOC concentration, cell abundance, and microbial community structure over the course of the experiment. Our results show no evidence of a priming effect regardless of the priming compound. Interestingly, priming compounds were selected for distinct microbial populations even when the compounds were chemically similar.

Indexed as

BacteriaCarbonDissolved Organic MatterMicrobiotaPseudoalteromonasPseudomonasSeawaterNitrogenOceans and SeasCarbonDissolved Organic MatterNitrogendeep oceandissolved organic carbonmarine microbiologyprimingSouthern Ocean

Identifiers

PMID40960292
PMCPMC12542645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.