ReviewTranslational vision science & technology2025
Stargardt's Connected Research Network Inaugural Meeting: Landscape Review and Horizon Scanning of Stargardt Disease.
Review in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of macular dystrophy in Japan (2011-2020): a nationwide population-based study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Update on the Management of ABCA4 Retinopathy (Stargardt Disease).Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to update the recent progress in the diagnosis, management, and treatments for Stargardt disease. Methods: On November 22, 2024, Stargardt's Connected held its inaugural meeting of their Research Network, attended by clinicians, researchers, industry partners, and patient representatives. This meeting aimed to provide an update on Stargardt disease management and research and develop a call to action for the wider community. The format was rapid-fire presentations followed by a roundtable discussion. This review presents the meeting proceeding, along with a summary of best up-to-date evidence and key calls to action. Results: Topics included: (1) advances in the understanding of Stargardt disease: natural history, genetic basis, animal models, and emerging therapies; (2) supporting individuals with Stargardt disease: disease impact, technological advancements, and lifestyle modifications; and (3) advancing research through stakeholder engagement, research registries, and patient input. The network acknowledges the importance of collaboration among patients, clinicians, researchers, and industry to address critical gaps in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of Stargardt disease. Patient engagement was emphasized as being crucial for driving progress in the field. Conclusions: Recent years have seen significant progress in understanding and managing Stargardt disease. Key calls to action included the areas of improving genetic testing and counseling, advancing research registries, supporting research and clinical trials, growing multidisciplinary care, addressing lifestyle and dietary modifications, and enhancing technological support. Translational Relevance: This Stargardt's Connected Research Network initiative outlines a multistakeholder engagement model to discuss ongoing research and emerging treatments for Stargardt disease, a condition with promising therapeutic developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.