Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40960192›Full record

ArticleThoracic research and practice2025

Assessment of Inspiratory Muscle Endurance in Healthy Adults by Recording Breathing Characteristics.

Selda Oğuz-Gökçen, Özgen Aras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Selda Oğuz-GökçenKütahya Health Sciences University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Kütahya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-7148
Özgen ArasPrivate Practice, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-881X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRespiratory muscle function is considered as strength and endurance. Since respiratory muscles are used a submaximally in daily life, measurement of respiratory muscle endurance rather than respiratory muscle strength is a more functional assessment. Measurement of respiratory muscle endurance is recommended to be performed by controlling the respiratory frequency and recording the breathing parameters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate respiratory muscle endurance with the incremental threshold loading (ITL) test in healthy adults by recording breathing parameters. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis observational, cross-sectional study included 112 healthy adult subjects aged between 18 to 35 years. The anthropometric characteristics (weight and height), pulmonary function testing including forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and physical activity level (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form - IPAQ-SF) were evaluated. Inspiratory muscle endurance is assessed with ITL.

resultsThe inspiratory muscle endurance (

conclusionInspiratory muscle endurance in healthy adults can be explained with MIP and MVV. The ITL testing that is performed by recording respiratory mechanics, such as the inspiratory volume, inspiratory flow and work of breathing, can guide the determination of respiratory muscle training intensity.

Indexed as

inspiratory flowinspiratory pressureinspiratory volumeMuscle endurance testrespiratory mechanicsrespiratory muscles

Identifiers

PMID40960192
PMCPMC12572905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.