Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Phase I Clinical Trial: Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections and Microneedling for Androgenetic Alopecia Treatment.
Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of conditioned media, platelet-rich fibrin, stromal vascular fraction, extracellular vesicles, and stem cells in androgenetic alopecia.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Phase I Clinical Trial: Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections and Microneedling for Androgenetic Alopecia Treatment.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Topical Minoxidil in Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Advances in Medicalized Hair Loss Solutions: A Review of Current Clinical Practices and Regenerative Medicine-Based Protocols with Focus on Off-Label Injectable Treatments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Promises and Pitfalls of Regenerative Therapies for Androgenetic Alopecia: Platelet-Rich Plasma, Photobiomodulation, Stem Cells, and Exosomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been widely utilized in dermatological treatments, leading to the development of various administration methods. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PRP injections and microneedling techniques for treating androgenetic alopecia (AGA) in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 40 participants diagnosed with AGA, aged between 18 and 50 years, were randomly assigned to receive either PRP injections or microneedling treatments. Each patient underwent two treatment sessions, with a 1-month interval between them. Hair density and thickness measurements were performed using TrichoScan before treatment and 2 months after the final session. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
resultsAmong the participants, 28.57% were male and 71.43% were female, with an average age of 40.2 years (±7.7). In the PRP injection group, hair count increased by approximately 62.4% (from 17.40 ± 2.074 to 28.26 ± 6.229), and hair thickness improved by 58.6% (from 58.0 ± 25.01 to 92.0 ± 16.31). In the microneedling group, hair count increased by 88.4% (from 14.71 ± 3.988 to 27.71 ± 4.499), while hair thickness improved by 51.3% (from 49.0 ± 11.30 to 74.14 ± 22.42). Although both groups showed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05), the intergroup differences in hair count and thickness were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
conclusionThe findings of this study confirm PRP as a viable treatment option for AGA. Both injection and microneedling methods provided therapeutic benefits. Additionally, microneedling appeared to enhance patient satisfaction and treatment tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.