ArticleCancer medicine2025
Optimization of First-Line Treatment Options in HER2-Altered Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of First-Line Treatment Options in HER2-Altered Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesHER2 alterations are identified in 2%-4% of lung adenocarcinoma, indicating poor clinical outcomes. Chemotherapy alone (C) or in combination with bevacizumab (BC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (IC), or both (IBC) are standard options in the first-line setting; however, optimal therapy and beneficiary populations remain unclear.
methodsPatients with Stage IV HER2-altered lung adenocarcinoma from four cancer centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. The patients received C, BC, IC, or IBC as the first-line treatments. Clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) characteristics were analyzed to explore the beneficiary populations with different treatments.
resultsIBC treatment generated the longest mPFS and OS among four schemes. Subgroup analyses showed that IBC resulted in longer PFS in patients with brain or bone metastases compared to IC. IBC generated significant benefits in younger patients, nonsmokers, and those with oligometastases versus BC. In patients with low density of PD-1
conclusionsIBC treatment generated optimal efficacy as first-line therapy for HER2-altered lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with low PD1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.