ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2025
Differentially expressed fusogens specify myocyte states to drive myogenesis.
Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species-specific functions of CSRP3 in satellite cell-driven muscle regeneration and relevance to porcine stem cell therapy.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026Article
- Deciphering skeletal muscle development: cellular heterogeneity and molecular regulatory networks from single-cell and spatial transcriptomic perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During myogenesis, myocyte fusion leads to the formation of multinucleated muscle fibers, but how exactly this process is initiated remains poorly understood. Here, we performed single-cell RNA-sequencing on mouse somites from E9.5-E11.5 embryos, revealing multiple differentiation states during primary myogenesis. Among these, we identified two unexpected myocyte populations: one expressing both myomaker (Mymk) and myomixer (Mymx) (termed Mc1) and another expressing only Mymk (termed Mc2). Fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated that both populations are mononucleated and co-exist within the same somites, with only Mc1 persisting during secondary myogenesis. Lineage tracing using Mymx:Cre; RosaTdT mice demonstrated that the Mc2 cells arise from the Mc1. Mechanistically, we show that Mef2 and Rxr factors positively and negatively regulate Mymx expression, respectively. Additionally, RXRG interacts with MYOD1 and MYOG, modulating their transcriptional activity in luciferase assays. Collectively, our findings uncover two populations among the myocytes that drive primary and secondary fiber formation, challenging the traditional view of vertebrate muscle precursor homogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.