ArticleJournal of cytology
Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of Pancreas: Insights from Cytopathology.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPEN) is a rare pancreatic tumor, constituting 2-3% of all pancreatic neoplasms, primarily affecting young women with a median age of 30. Its prognosis is generally favorable due to the low incidence of metastasis and successful surgical resection. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is crucial, as its cytological features are distinctive. Aim: To elucidate the significance of cytopathology in the detection of SPEN, associated diagnostic pearls and pitfalls, and histopathologic correlation. Materials and Methods: All SPEN cases diagnosed through cytomorphology were retrieved from the hospital medical records, and relevant clinical information was compiled. Cytopathology and histopathology slides were obtained from the archives and reviewed. Results: All four cases were middle-aged women (mean age = 40 years) presenting with abdominal pain. Imaging showed solid-cystic lesions. The diagnosis of SPEN was rendered on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), with characteristic papillary and glandular patterns. Histology confirmed the diagnosis with 100% cytohistological concordance in all four cases. Conclusion: FNAC is an effective tool for the detection of SPEN, allowing precise diagnosis, guiding surgery, and reducing the need for extensive resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.