Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959812›Full record

ArticleJournal of cytology

Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of Pancreas: Insights from Cytopathology.

Isha Makker, Zachariah Chowdhury, Paramita Paul, Ipsita Dhal, Sadaf Haiyat, Shashikant Patne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isha MakkerDepartment of Oncopathology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (Tata Memorial Centre), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Zachariah ChowdhuryDepartment of Oncopathology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (Tata Memorial Centre), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Paramita PaulDepartment of Oncopathology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (Tata Memorial Centre), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ipsita DhalDepartment of Oncopathology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (Tata Memorial Centre), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sadaf HaiyatDepartment of Oncopathology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (Tata Memorial Centre), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shashikant PatneDepartment of Oncopathology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (Tata Memorial Centre), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPEN) is a rare pancreatic tumor, constituting 2-3% of all pancreatic neoplasms, primarily affecting young women with a median age of 30. Its prognosis is generally favorable due to the low incidence of metastasis and successful surgical resection. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is crucial, as its cytological features are distinctive. Aim: To elucidate the significance of cytopathology in the detection of SPEN, associated diagnostic pearls and pitfalls, and histopathologic correlation. Materials and Methods: All SPEN cases diagnosed through cytomorphology were retrieved from the hospital medical records, and relevant clinical information was compiled. Cytopathology and histopathology slides were obtained from the archives and reviewed. Results: All four cases were middle-aged women (mean age = 40 years) presenting with abdominal pain. Imaging showed solid-cystic lesions. The diagnosis of SPEN was rendered on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), with characteristic papillary and glandular patterns. Histology confirmed the diagnosis with 100% cytohistological concordance in all four cases. Conclusion: FNAC is an effective tool for the detection of SPEN, allowing precise diagnosis, guiding surgery, and reducing the need for extensive resection.

Indexed as

Cytohistological correlationcytopathologyFNAC can be a very promising procedure in the detection of SPEN, provided the pathologists are aware of the diagnostic pearls and pitfalls. An accurate cytological diagnosis can eliminate the need for a biopsy, assist the surgeon in making clear decisions during surgery, and help prevent unnecessary extensive surgical resections.pancreassolid-pseudopapillary neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID40959812
PMCPMC12435871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.