Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959811›Full record

ArticleJournal of cytology

Machine Learning of Urine Cytology Highlights Increased Neutrophil Count in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma.

Moe Kameda, Sayaka Kobayashi, Yoshimi Nishijima, Ryosuke Akuzawa, Rio Kaneko, Rio Shibanuma, Seiji Arai, Hayato Ikota, Kazuhiro Suzuki, Hideaki Yokoo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Moe KamedaLaboratory of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
Sayaka KobayashiLaboratory of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
Yoshimi NishijimaLaboratory of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
Ryosuke AkuzawaLaboratory of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
Rio KanekoLaboratory of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
Rio ShibanumaLaboratory of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
Seiji AraiDepartment of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Hayato IkotaClinical Department of Pathology, Gunma University Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Kazuhiro SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Hideaki YokooDepartment of Human Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Masanao SaioLaboratory of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study conducted an unsupervised learning cluster analysis on urine cytological images of high-grade urothelial carcinoma to assess their explanatory potential. Materials and Methods: A total of 124 urine cytology specimens of urothelial carcinoma, collected between December 2010 to December 2021 at Gunma University Hospital, were analyzed. Ten cytological image fields per specimen were captured, and pathological T factors were examined using principal component analysis and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) with machine learning (ML) software. Common image features were also verbalized and manually reevaluated. Results: In the t-SNE analysis, the T1-dominant region was characterized by "few cells in the background," whereas the T2-dominant region showed "many cells in the image," "numerous neutrophils in the image," and "abundant tumor cells in the image." Human reassessment identified significant differences related to muscle invasion status for all findings except "abundant tumor cells in the image." Furthermore, we confirmed that histological neutrophil infiltration was related to the abundance of neutrophils in the cytological specimens. Conclusion: This study is noteworthy as the cluster analysis identified previously unreported variations in background cell types and quality linked to muscle invasion status, and it also demonstrated the explainability of ML-derived findings through manual reassessment.

Indexed as

Explainable AImachine learningt-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE)urine cytologyurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40959811
PMCPMC12435878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.