ArticleGeneral psychiatry2025
Predictive value of biomarker signatures for suicide risk in hospitalised patients with major depressive disorders: a multicentre study in Shanghai.
Article in General psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- National trends of mental health and service utilisation among international students in the USA, 2015-2024.General psychiatry · 2025Article
- Moving beyond diagnostic labels in psychiatry: outcome-linked treatment modelling.General psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biomarkers for predicting suicide risk in hospitalised patients with mental disorders have been understudied. Currently, suicide risk assessment tools based on objective indicators are limited in China. Aims: To examine the value of various biomarkers in suicide risk prediction and develop a risk assessment model with clinical utility using machine learning. Methods: This cohort study analysed patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who were hospitalised for the first time between January 2016 and March 2023 from four specialised mental health institutions. A total of 139 features, including biomarker measurements, medical orders and psychological scales, were assessed for analysis. Their suicide risk was evaluated by qualified nurses using Nurse's Global Assessment of Suicide Risk within 1 week after admission. Five machine learning models were trained with 10-fold cross-validation across three hospitals and were externally validated in an independent cohort. The primary performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The model was interpreted using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. Biomarker importance was evaluated by comparing model performance with and without these biomarkers. Results: Of 3143 patients with MDD included in this study, the incidence of high suicide risk within 1 week after first admission was 660 (21.0%). Among all models, the Extreme Gradient Boosting can more effectively predict future risks, with an AUROC higher than 0.8 (p<0.001). The SHAP values identified the 10 most important features, including five biomarkers. After clustering analysis, electroconvulsive therapy, physical restraint, β2-microglobulin and triiodothyronine were found to have heterogeneous effects on suicide risk. Combining biomarkers with other data from electronic health records significantly improved the performance and clinical utility of machine learning models based on demographics, diagnosis, laboratory tests, medical orders and psychological scales. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential for a biomarker-based suicide risk assessment for patients with MDD, emphasising the interaction between biomarkers and therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.