Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959756›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Reward processing deficits: weakened self-reward association in individuals with methamphetamine addiction undergoing abstinence.

Xie Yanghui, Fan Chong, Li Qianyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xie YanghuiKey Laboratory of Cognition and Human Behavior in Hunan Province, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Fan ChongKey Laboratory of Cognition and Human Behavior in Hunan Province, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Li QianyuPublic Mental Health Prevention Office, The Ninth Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research primarily investigates whether both reward processing and self-processing are aberrant in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder. It also explores whether initiating self-referential processing modulates reward processing abilities in this population, and how this modulation differs from that observed in healthy controls. Experiment 1 employed a two-factor mixed experimental design to compare the performance of addiction groups with varying withdrawal durations (all participants in the addiction groups were methamphetamine users) against healthy control groups in a probabilistic reward learning task. The results indicated that the healthy control group performed better than the addiction group in learning characters associated with high-probability, high-reward outcomes. While the long-term abstinence group outperformed the short-term abstinence group, these differences were not statistically significant. Therefore, the addiction group subjects in Experiments 2 and 3, the addiction group consisted of methamphetamine users with a uniform withdrawal duration of no more than 12 months. Experiment 2 utilized a two-factor mixed design to explore whether self-processing is abnormal in addicted individuals. The results showed that the addiction group had a significantly lower accuracy rate for self-referential characters compared to the healthy control group, while their accuracy for characters associated with acquaintances was significantly higher than that of the healthy control group. Experiment 3 also employed a two-factor mixed design to examine the moderating effect of self-processing on reward learning. The findings revealed that when high-probability reward characters were linked to self-relevance, learning efficiency was superior to that of characters linked to acquaintances. However, this moderating effect was weaker in the addiction group compared to the healthy control group. These results suggest that substance addiction not only impairs individuals' reward processing abilities but also reduces their sensitivity to self-referential information. Furthermore, the enhancing effect of self-processing on reward learning is significantly diminished in addicted populations, providing new insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying addiction.

Indexed as

addictionGo/No-Go paradigmmethamphetaminereward processingself-processing

Identifiers

PMID40959756
PMCPMC12434089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.