ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Reward processing deficits: weakened self-reward association in individuals with methamphetamine addiction undergoing abstinence.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal brain dynamics and prediction of craving changes in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research primarily investigates whether both reward processing and self-processing are aberrant in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder. It also explores whether initiating self-referential processing modulates reward processing abilities in this population, and how this modulation differs from that observed in healthy controls. Experiment 1 employed a two-factor mixed experimental design to compare the performance of addiction groups with varying withdrawal durations (all participants in the addiction groups were methamphetamine users) against healthy control groups in a probabilistic reward learning task. The results indicated that the healthy control group performed better than the addiction group in learning characters associated with high-probability, high-reward outcomes. While the long-term abstinence group outperformed the short-term abstinence group, these differences were not statistically significant. Therefore, the addiction group subjects in Experiments 2 and 3, the addiction group consisted of methamphetamine users with a uniform withdrawal duration of no more than 12 months. Experiment 2 utilized a two-factor mixed design to explore whether self-processing is abnormal in addicted individuals. The results showed that the addiction group had a significantly lower accuracy rate for self-referential characters compared to the healthy control group, while their accuracy for characters associated with acquaintances was significantly higher than that of the healthy control group. Experiment 3 also employed a two-factor mixed design to examine the moderating effect of self-processing on reward learning. The findings revealed that when high-probability reward characters were linked to self-relevance, learning efficiency was superior to that of characters linked to acquaintances. However, this moderating effect was weaker in the addiction group compared to the healthy control group. These results suggest that substance addiction not only impairs individuals' reward processing abilities but also reduces their sensitivity to self-referential information. Furthermore, the enhancing effect of self-processing on reward learning is significantly diminished in addicted populations, providing new insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying addiction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.