ArticleCureus2025
Screened Realities: Exploring the Intensity and Portrayal of Youth Suicide in Films.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Suicide remains one of the leading causes of death among youth aged 15-29 years, and how it is portrayed in the media can influence public perception. Methods This study aimed to evaluate the intensity of youth suicide portrayals in movies, focusing on whether these portrayals reflect real-life risk factors and offer responsible messaging. We analyzed 11 films using a mixed-method approach: the Movies and Video: Identification and Emotions in reaction to Suicide (MoVIES) scale was used to assess the intensity of scenes depicting suicide, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage (SAFE-T) tool helped identify risk and protective factors that were shown in the movies. We also conducted content analysis to explore emerging themes. Results The results showed that while most movies included realistic stressors, none portrayed a family history of suicide, psychiatric hospitalization, or preventive interventions. A few films stood out with higher MoVIES scores and lacked content warnings, which could pose a risk for vulnerable audiences. Conclusions While not every portrayal leads to harm, it is clear that the intensity of suicide depiction without guidance or support can do more damage than good. We believe there is a need for more collaboration between filmmakers and mental health professionals to ensure that sensitive topics like suicide are portrayed in a way that can open a dialogue and enhance awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.