Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Optimal l-arginine dosage for pressure injury healing in home care settings: a six-month retrospective analysis.

Nai-Ching Chen, Lihui Pu, Tai-Yang Huang, Chia-Shu Lin, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Yu-Yu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nai-Ching ChenDepartment of Nursing, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Lihui PuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Nursing Science, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Tai-Yang HuangDepartment of Nursing, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chia-Shu LinDepartment of Nursing, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chuan HungSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Yu-Yu LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries present a significant challenge for patients receiving home care, particularly those with limited mobility. Although l-arginine supplementation has shown promise for wound healing, the optimal dosage remains unclear. This study compared the effectiveness of two daily l-arginine doses (7 g versus 14 g) in treating pressure injuries over a six-month period. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 adult patients with grade 3 or 4 pressure injuries who received home care between June and December 2023. Patient wounds were evaluated using the DESIGN-R assessment tool, which measures various aspects of wound healing. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0, employing generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for repeated measurements over time. Results: The study found that patients receiving the 7 g daily l-arginine dose showed significantly better wound healing after 1 month compared to those receiving 14 g ( Conclusion: Our findings indicate that a daily 7 g l-arginine supplement effectively promotes both early- and late-stage healing of pressure injuries in home-care patients. This lower dose not only matches or exceeds the healing outcomes of the higher dose, but also presents a more cost-effective treatment option. Healthcare providers may consider implementing a 7 g dosage as a standard protocol for pressure injury treatment in home care settings.

Indexed as

ArginineHome Care ServicesPressure UlcerWound HealingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArgininehome carel-arginine supplementationnutritional interventionpressure injuriesretrospective studywound healing

Identifiers

PMID40959646
PMCPMC12434103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.