ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Evaluation of High-Throughput Gene Chip Array for Enhanced Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Infections: A Comparative Analysis with mNGS and Conventional Culture Methods.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While conventional culture-based diagnosis of bone and joint infections (BJI) requires prolonged incubation periods and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) remains cost-prohibitive for routine clinical use, there is an urgent need for diagnostic strategies that balance timeliness with economic feasibility. This study investigates the clinical utility of a high-throughput (HT) gene chip array as a novel solution, offering significantly shorter turnaround time while maintaining cost-effectiveness than mNGS expenses. Methods: Thirty-six patients of the BJI group (28 positives and 8 negatives diagnosed by clinician) and 20 patients of respiratory tract infection (RTI) group (14 positives and 6 negatives diagnosed by clinician) were included in this study. Synovial fluid and ultrasound fluid samples of BJI group and alveolar lavage fluid samples of RTI group were collected and subjected to microbiological analysis performed by HT gene chip array, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional culture. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Positive and negative percent agreement and Cohen`s kappa coefficient were calculated. Results: The sensitivity and accuracy of HT gene chip assay for BJI detection was 71.43% and 77.78%, respectively ( Conclusion: HT gene chip assay demonstrates superior diagnostic specificity and cost-effectiveness with rapid turnaround, significantly reducing unnecessary invasive procedures while maintaining high concordance with mNGS, and exhibited higher clinical value of BJI diagnosis compared with mNGS and conventional culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.