Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959519›Full record

ArticlePsychology and sexuality2025

Pain for pain: the benefits and challenges of BDSM participation for people with chronic pain - An exploratory study.

Reni Forer, Bryce Westlake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and sexuality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reni ForerUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Bryce WestlakeDepartment of Justice Studies, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA.

Funding

NPGH LEADERs YR12: OBSSR (Greenberg, Ngwafong Mukere) & NIBIB (Lee)D43TW009345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Dibyadyuti Datta, Chandy C. John · 2017 to 2026
$15.2M
Severe Malaria And Risk to The Brain (SMART Brain)R01NS055349 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Chandy C. John, Ruth Namazzi · 2008 to 2026
$11.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009345NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research is beginning to find that many BDSM (bondage/discipline, domination/submission, sadism/masochism) practitioners experience benefits beyond sexual pleasure. Additionally, given the relationship between pain and pleasure common in BDSM, there may be certain unanticipated benefits for practitioners reporting chronic pain (PRCP). We conducted an online survey of an international convenience sample of BDSM practitioners (N = 525). Participants were asked about self-perceived benefits and challenges related to participating in BDSM with CP. Using chi-square, independent sample t-test, logistic regression, and linear-by-linear association, responses were combined with demographics, participation timelines, co-participants, motivations, and frequency of activities to identify differences between PRCP and not reporting CP. PRCP do not appear to initially seek out BDSM for pain management but report both physical and mental benefits and identify mental health as a motivation for continued participation. Many PRCP also report at least some short-term pain relief resulting from BDSM participation. Importantly, they are more likely to engage in higher intense sensation activities (e.g. edge-play) more frequently. This study provides a foundation for further investigation into the nuanced relationship between CP and BDSM participation, especially in relation to the intensity and type of activities engaged in.

Indexed as

BDSMchronic painedge playmental healthquality of life

Identifiers

PMID40959519
PMCPMC12435486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.