ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2025
Extrapolation before imputation reduces bias when imputing censored covariates.
Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling symptom progression to identify ideal subjects for a Huntington's disease clinical trial is problematic since time to diagnosis, a key covariate, can be heavily censored. Imputation is an appealing strategy that replaces the censored covariate with its conditional mean, but existing methods saw over 200% bias under heavy censoring. Calculating conditional means well requires estimating and then integrating over the survival function of the censored covariate from the censored value to infinity. To estimate the survival function flexibly, existing methods use the semiparametric Cox model with Breslow's estimator, leaving the integrand for the conditional means (the survival function) undefined beyond the observed data. The integral is then estimated up to the largest observed covariate value, and this approximation can cut off the tail of the survival function and lead to severe bias. We combine the semiparametric survival estimator with a parametric extension to approximate the integral up to infinity. In simulations, our proposed extrapolation-before-imputation approach substantially reduces the bias seen with existing imputation methods, sometimes even when the parametric extension was misspecified. We further demonstrate how imputing with corrected conditional means can prioritize subjects for clinical trials. The R code to reproduce results is available in the Supplementary Material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.