ArticleCABI one health2025
One Health policy communities' perspectives on zoonoses risk factors and management: A multiple qualitative methods approach.
Article in CABI one health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multiphase Implementation of Ring Treatment: A Community-Engaged Control Program for T. Solium taeniasis/cysticercosis in Northern Peru.Research square · 2026Article
- Cross-sectoral collaborations and funding and coordination mechanisms in One Health zoonoses management in Peru.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zoonoses emergence and endemicity are serious global public health problems that disproportionately affect low-resource settings. One Health (OH) serves as a framework to understand the interconnection of zoonoses risk factors and incentivizes collaboration, coordination, and communication among sectors. However, OH encounters barriers related to power imbalances, gaps in coordination, and conflicts of interest among diverse communities of practice, which are groups that share a problem and domain of interest and engage in collective learning. This research aims to elucidate the mental models of policy communities, which are representations of the environment, and how humans explain and predict their surroundings to describe their perspectives on zoonoses' risk factors and management. We used a multiple methods approach, including qualitative system dynamics and rapid qualitative methods (RQM), to describe the perspectives of policy communities regarding the drivers of zoonoses emergence and endemicity and the complexity of zoonoses management. Participants included national and sub-national policy makers and key informants integral to zoonoses programs in Peru, including representatives of human, animal, and environmental systems. We completed 77 semi-structured interviews from June 2023 to November 2023, and the final analytical sample included 75 interviews, excluding 2 incomplete interviews. Participants' mental models were represented with synthesized systems dynamics diagrams. Main themes and quotes from the RQM added context to the diagrams and described participants' perspectives regarding zoonoses management complexity. Representatives from animal, human, and environmental public organizations described a similar structural conceptualization of the risk factors related to pets, humans, wildlife, and livestock, identifying economic, social, and environmental risk factors linked to zoonoses emergence and endemicity. Central themes include: global structural economic and social forces; factors affecting biodiversity and natural reservoirs; environmental changes; medical and public health services; country economic factors; rural reliance on farming and limited funding; agricultural factors; and water, hygiene, and sanitation-responsive governance. The system dynamics diagrams illustrated interrelationships between pet, human, wildlife, and livestock populations. However, risk factors related to zoonoses affecting livestock were more prominently represented. Participants recognized the need to apply OH to address zoonoses; however, contextual factors, such as regional adaptation, were necessary in poor rural areas. The study's results inform about value systems that guide political action and decision making among the diverse OH communities of practice. A similar application in high-income settings could identify differences in zoonoses' risk factors that may not be related to rural vulnerability or poverty. Further research is needed to describe the interconnection of organizational factors associated with OH collaborations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.