Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959476›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada2024

Telerehabilitation Implementation: Perspectives from Physiotherapists Working in Complex Care.

Jennifer O'Neil, Jacquie van Ierssel, Judy King, Heidi Sveistrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer O'NeilFrom the: University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3478-4459
Jacquie van IersselChildren Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Judy KingFrom the: University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Heidi SveistrupFrom the: University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid change in ways clinicians deliver physiotherapy services, leading to an important uprise in telerehabilitation implementation. Sharing the experiences of physiotherapists in clinically adopting this technology during this initial wave of the pandemic can influence future implementation. This mixed-method study aimed to identify the barriers and new facilitators of telerehabilitation clinical implementation. Method: Canadian physiotherapists with and without telerehabilitation experience, working in various clinical settings, were recruited during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants completed the Assessing Determinants of Prospective Uptake of Virtual Reality instrument (ADOPT-VR) adapted for telerehabilitation and participated in online focus groups to explore their experiences with telerehabilitation implementation. Demographic data and ADOPT-VR responses were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Sixteen physiotherapists completed the study. Scores on the Likert scale showed that physiotherapists enjoyed telerehabilitation (7.5/10) and perceived it as being useful (7.3/10). Physiotherapists disagreed with the necessity to use only minimal mental efforts (4.4/10) and feeling familiar with the evidence (4.7/10). Limited access to telerehabilitation implementation evidence, a reduced hands-on approach, and a lack of validated remote assessments were reported as barriers. Clinical practice guidelines, validated remote neurological assessments, changes in physiotherapy curriculum, and policy-making are critical to improving telerehabilitation implementation within physiotherapy practices. Conclusions: Participants positively experienced the quick use of telerehabilitation from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, but some important barriers remain.

Indexed as

assessmentsclinical implementationCOVID-19neurologytelerehabilitation.

Identifiers

PMID40959476
PMCPMC12392822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.