ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A case report of eruptive pruritic papular porokeratosis with atopic dermatitis treated with upadacitinib: a novel therapeutic perspective.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Case of Refractory Giant Porokeratosis, Treated With a New Treatment Approach Consisting of Ablative COClinical case reports · 2026Article
- Successful Treatment of Linear Porokeratosis with Ivarmacitinib in an Adolescent: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Successful Treatment of Localized Eruptive Pruritic Papular Porokeratosis with A Single Session of Cryotherapy: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eruptive pruritic papular porokeratosis is a rare subtype of porokeratosis, characterized by the appearance of intensely pruritic erythematous papules. Conventional therapies-including antihistamines, corticosteroids, and retinoids-often yield limited clinical benefit. This case report describes a 73-year-old Chinese man diagnosed with eruptive pruritic papular porokeratosis coexisting with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The patient developed widespread erythematous papules involving the scalp, trunk, and extremities, accompanied by severe pruritus and exudation secondary to scratching. Despite prior treatment with tofacitinib, acitretin, tripterygium glycosides, and antihistamines (epinastine and olopatadine), the patient exhibited a suboptimal clinical response. Consequently, treatment with upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was initiated. Within one week, pruritus markedly improved, and the papules began to flatten. After one month of therapy, pruritus had nearly resolved, and the skin lesions showed progressive regression. The patient continued on a reduced dose of upadacitinib, without evidence of relapse or treatment-related adverse events during follow-up. This case highlights the potential of upadacitinib as an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for eruptive pruritic papular porokeratosis with concurrent atopic dermatitis, particularly in refractory cases. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.