ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Prehospital blood transfusion-experience from a specialized prehospital response vehicle-a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the use and clinical implications of prehospital packed red blood cells administered by a specialized physician-staffed Medical Intervention Car in a German emergency medical service system capable of advanced interventions such as thoracotomy and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all prehospital patients treated with at least one unit of packed red blood cells (pRBC) by the MIC team between August 2019 and September 2024. In the trauma cohort, we compared characteristics and interventions between those who were admitted to the hospital and those for whom resuscitation was commenced on scene. For in-hospital comparisons, patients were grouped into two categories: those who continued to receive pRBCs and those who did not. A modified blood transfusion need score (mBTNS) was retrospectively applied to assess the clinical appropriateness of transfusion. Results: A total of 57 patients received pRBCs, including 45 with traumatic and 12 with non-traumatic hemorrhage. Among trauma patients, 78% were male, 49% sustained penetrating injuries, and 56% were in traumatic cardiac arrest. There were higher rates of primary dispatch by the dispatch center in patients admitted to the hospital (43% vs. 13%; Conclusion: Prehospital transfusion by a trained MIC team led to high survival rates in trauma and non-trauma patients. The frequent invasive procedures underline the need for integrated prehospital blood transfusion within advanced care. Broader adoption of structured protocols in high-acuity systems warrants prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.