Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959413›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Challenges and Methods in Annotating Natural Speech for Neurolinguistic Research.

Galit Agmon, Manuela Jaeger, Ella Magen, Danna Pinto, Yuval Perelmuter, Elana Zion Golumbic, Martin G Bleichner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Galit AgmonDepartment of English Literature and Linguistics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9588-5953
Manuela JaegerNeurophysiology of Everyday Life Group, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1272-1633
Ella MagenGonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8773-5651
Danna PintoGonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-4214
Yuval PerelmuterGonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7519-8177
Elana Zion GolumbicGonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-3188
Martin G BleichnerNeurophysiology of Everyday Life Group, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-9238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spoken language is central to human communication, influencing cognition, learning, and social interactions. Despite its spontaneous nature, characterized by disfluencies, fillers, self-corrections and irregular syntax, it effectively serves its communicative purpose. Understanding how the brain processes natural language offers valuable insights into the neurobiology of language. Recent neuroscience advancements allow us to study neural processes in response to ongoing speech, requiring detailed, time-locked descriptions of speech material to capture the nuances of spoken language. While there are many speech-to-text tools available, obtaining a time-locked true verbatim transcript, reflecting everything that was uttered, requires additional effort to achieve an accurate representation. We demonstrate the challenges involved in the process of obtaining time-resolved annotation of spontaneous speech, by presenting two semi-automatic pipelines, developed for German and Hebrew but adaptable to other languages. The outputs of these pipelines enable analyses of the neural representation and processing of key linguistic features. We discuss the methodological challenges and opportunities posed by current state-of-the-art pipelines, and advocate for new lines of natural language processing research aimed at advancing our understanding of how the brain processes everyday language.

Indexed as

annotationcomputational linguisticsGermanHebrewnatural speechtemporal response function (TRF)transcription

Identifiers

PMID40959413
PMCPMC12435784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.