Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40959318›Full record

ReviewBlood science (Baltimore, Md.)2025

The evolution of artificial red blood cells and recent advances in state-of-the-art oxygen carrier technologies: a narrative review.

Trasha Shetty, Anshuman Darbari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood science (Baltimore, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trasha ShettyCTVS Department, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand 249203, India.
Anshuman DarbariCTVS Department, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand 249203, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for homologous blood transfusions has reached an unprecedented level, driven by a declining donor population and the ever-increasing need for blood products. While significant advancements have been made in medical equipment and techniques, a critical gap remains in developing an effective alternative to conventional blood transfusion. Medical research to find a proper blood substitute involves many previous experiments. The search for a blood substitute has been ongoing for patients for whom human blood is unavailable, with a few products showing promise in this field. Recent advancements in medical innovation have begun to address this challenge, notably through the development of artificial oxygen carriers (AOCs). These laboratory-synthesized alternatives to traditional blood transfusions offer a means of bypassing the need for human blood, particularly packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions. While AOCs fulfill the singular, critical role of in vivo oxygen delivery, the term is frequently used interchangeably with the broader concept of artificial blood. Various AOC products are currently in different stages of clinical development. Most Notable examples include Perftoran, which has been approved in Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, the Kyrgyz Republic, and Mexico and has been administered to over 35,000 patients. Another significant product, Hemopure, has received clinical use approval in South Africa and Russia and has obtained expanded use approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). This article examines the landscape of AOCs, including their preparation methods, available products, regulatory approval status, current applications, limitations, and potential for future use in medical practice. This review article offers an overview of the different types of AOCs currently available, focusing on their clinical development for human use.

Indexed as

Artificial bloodArtificial oxygen carriersHemoglobinPerfluorocarbon-based oxygen carriersRed blood cell substitutes

Identifiers

PMID40959318
PMCPMC12435547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.